A different kind of math.
10 Dec 2011 6 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: articles, blog, ctwfrank, culture, economics, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, irony, linguistics, News, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, society, thoughts, writing
I do not now, nor have I ever subscribed to or validated the concept of ethnicity in any way, because the math says it is irrelevant to the human condition. This is also why I have never written any math that takes ethnicity into account as a legitimate variable; as I have said before: “There is no them, there’s only us.”
This is now how everyone else thinks, however. The one only human construct more absurd and utterly evil than the word ethnicity is what was born from it: racism. That’s all I have to say about that. In spite of this, ethnicity looks like it might be a factor in the impending, inevitable and imminent change that we must all navigate to the human condition. This does not change the fact that the word and its mutated offspring are unacceptable, it simply means that I wrote this single and solitary post from the perspective that we gave those words. If it sounds contradictory to what you just read; it’s not; it’s just a different kind of math but it’s just as true and valid as all the math. It is the same math that says that even though only about 40 people will undoubtedly understand what follows, (they will all definitely read this post) there’s a possibility than many others will understand it as well. That would be a good thing, and it’s time for some good things. Following is the only math I will ever include in the Catalogue of Calculations that is in any way based on ethnicity. I won’t explain this math, I’ll let you figure it out; it may just be the only atom of value that exists when it comes to ethnicity.
The single biggest honor that as ever been bestowed on me in the whole of my life actually happened several times: the same honor, bestowed by several different people at different times, who all genuinely treated me, and continue to treat me, as a black man.
That says it all.
ctwfrank
Six ideas that will never work to fix the global crisis: (this is only a partial list).
04 Dec 2011 5 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, culture, economics, education, family, financial crisis, history, inspiration, Life, love, News, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, reviews, thoughts, video
- Anything containing the words “they”, “them”, “somebody” or “someone”, as in; “They should increase the enforcement of the xxxx law, that will reduce the burden on XXX or “Someone better make sure that they stop printing so much money.” We shouldn’t forget that it was them who got us into this mess to begin with.
- Anything that would use an existing law, social mechanism, or system as part of a solution to anything, as in: “If they backed off a bit on quantitative easement and balanced it out with a payroll tax credit stimulus, then small businesses would be motivated to hire workers.” Nothing that we have come up with so far, not one law, social tool, government, political ideology or anything else has ever worked; if any one of them would have worked, we wouldn’t be in this situation, so what good is it to use something that we already know doesn’t work? We need a new way of thinking to solve the global crisis.
- Anything that would allow for people to continue believing that the debt that we suddenly seem to be saddled with and which is slowing strangling us all is real. There is no debt, they are just numbers on a ledger that people believed were real dollars and let the banks use them as real dollars. According to global authorities, when added together, there is approximately $84 Trillion in debt in the world and $32 Trillion in wealth (money, gold and things that have value) – that isn’t even POSSIBLE. How can we owe more than what there is. It’s like claiming to be “a little bit pregnant.” it’s just not possible.
- Anything that would promote inaction and prevent actual change, as in; “What can anyone do? It’s not like I can make a difference in anything.” Or “We’re just going to have to wait this out and see what happens.” It would behoove us to remember that if we do not change the direction in which we are all headed as a global civilization, what lies ahead is the utter obliteration of the human condition as we know it.
- Anything that deposits our trust and confidence in luck, magic, and especially unbelievable stories, as in; “Things are definitely bad, but eventually, they will figure something out; they always do, and then everything will be back to normal, it always does”. Not this time.
- Anything that promotes the idea that a “good, old-fashioned war” or any action based on violence will provide the incentive and stimulus that we need to improve the global crisis. I certainly hope that there’s no one left in the work who actually believes THAT.
These are all things that definitely will not work to provide a solution to our global crisis; so what will work? We simply haven’t come up with that yet, but we CAN. We can do better.
…and while we’re on the subject of GOLD
01 Dec 2011 4 Comments
in Money Tags: all, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, design, economics, education, family, financial crisis, history, humanity, Life, linguistics, local, miscellaneous, money, movies, News, people, personal, philosophy, random, reviews, society, thoughts, writing
Okay, let’s continue being serious for a moment about GOLD. The gold phenomenon, as I like to call it, is very closely tied to the events that led to where we are today, which can accurately be described as a cluster fuck, but on a planetary scale. If we take this disease that is killing the human race (because our idiocy has become a disease) and boil it down to the simplest possible explanation, it would be this: When we developed trade and commerce and an economy, it was good – very good; we shouldn’t forget that the human race went from being little more than a handful of half-starved nomads always moving and looking for food to having excesses, luxuries, slaves, titles, position and properties in the span of a couple of thousand years. After 250,000 years of looking for food and water all the time, this was the blink of an eye. Civilization, as it were, was gourmet fare for the human ego, which ate it up with gusto; the way only we can: by gorging on what felt good now without giving a second thought as to…well, as to anything. We just kept heading in the direction of MORE! Why should anyone think that we could run out of anything – the first 3,000-4,000 years after the Neolithic revolution was phat! There was plenty for everyone, in fact we wouldn’t come up with the concept of poverty for some time; remember, you have to be free to be poor and you would be surprised at the percentage of the human race that were slaves and for how long. We acted without thinking, planning or considering the consequences. Doesn’t that sound familiar? It was the same 12,000 years ago. We may have airplanes and computers but we have not curtailed our insatiable appetite for irresponsibility by even a little. You can count on a human being to fuck something up, and that we did, especially when we picked a metal: gold, to be the raw material for this new thing we called MONEY. Money was such an incredibly addictive and irresistible goodie that it simply froze our minds. No one and I mean no one thought about or worried about what we would do when we ran out of gold. Maybe there was some ignorance involved, but anyone who has ever been in charge of anything since we’ve had money had to have known that people multiplied, quickly, but not gold, in fact every year, it became just a tiny bit more difficult to find new gold. We didn’t need to pinpoint a specific year, but just knowing that at some point in the future it just wouldn’t work anymore because there would be more people needing to use money than there was gold to be money was enough to act on. It’s typical of us. Right now, even at this stage of our descent into who-knows-what, if by some chance a huge asteroid made of pure gold were to pass within range of our rockets and we lassoed that planet-sized nugget of the stuff that dreams are made of, anchored it to the moon, took its measurements, and started to figure out exactly how much hold was on the asteroid, we would get to “more than what we need right now” and just stop counting. Why bother? We hit our nut! We filled up the hole that we made! We would, and we all know it. We would have gold orgies and the filthy rich would become indescribably rich and be happy, and the poor and downtrodden would still be poor and downtrodden but happy because they would still have that shitty job that barely paid them enough to live on – the one that they lost at some point between 3 years ago and today. We would continue to ignore half of all of us – the ones that there was never enough for in the first place and they would continue to starve to death because even though our own stupidity is killing us, we don’t want to change because change requires thinking and actual work and those things make our brains hurt – unless there’s money involved.
So we ignored the math and based our wealth on gold. Fine, so how did the whole wealth thing work? How was new money made? Up until possibly the 1960’s (that’s a guess, but I think a good one) for there to be new money, there had to be new wealth. This requires a quick recap of the history of human wealth. If you recall, the wealth of the world and of nations had always been food, which may very well remain as the only real thing of value in human history, and then we came up with the concept of money to use as a medium of exchange because it was simply too cumbersome and tedious to trade in food directly. We chose gold as the material from which we would make the money that would represent the wealth (food) and be much easier to carry and transact since it is a soft metal and easily formed into coins. Then we got so used to dealing and transacting gold, that we forgot it only represented wealth and, just as Aristotle warned, we confused it with wealth – but no one said anything, we just took it as a given that gold was the wealth of the world and when food came up in conversation, it would quickly be referred to as a commodity, usually in the futures market – yes, futures, as in; not yesterday or today, but the future, you know that thing that we can not predict but for some strange reason can buy and sell. This continued and evolved until trade and commerce became so widespread (because we love to fuck and reproduce like rabbits) that a sub-category of money had to be created: currency (including paper money). The first bank notes appeared sometime in the 16th century of thereabouts, in Scandinavia (That’s an interesting story, remind me to write about it sometime.) and it caught on quickly. By the 19th century, paper money was in common used and was valued at par with gold because they were redeemable for gold at just about any bank. During all this time, gold was wealth. Paper notes were portable representations of gold and therefore notes were only printed based on how much gold there was. At some point we realized that the amount of gold was finite; that’s when wealth became a privilege and we began to acquire it by using war or theft or fraud, you know good old fashioned proven techniques. Then, all of a sudden, just like that: there was no more new gold. That was it. All the money there was, was all the money there was, but the human progress train didn’t notice, it kept right on going. Oh Shit! What do we do now! There’s no more gold to make more money! If people find out, it will be a freaking disaster! What to do? What to do? It didn’t take us very long, we figured: what the heck, if we’ve screwed the pooch, then let’s screw it properly! Nobody said anything, not a word, then, suddenly (and I mean suddenly) in August of 1972, the President of the United States of America went on the air (TV and radio) early in the morning, before the markets opened and rattled off a list of “executive decisions” which included: “a 90 day freeze on prices and wages, an immediate 10% import surtax and the severing of the link between the dollar and gold (meaning that one could no longer want into a Federal Reserve bank with a $20 and walk out with however much gold that got them). It got a little attention at the time, it’s getting A LOT of attention now. That single act literally killed the concept that we know as money. The price of gold was fixed in dollars and the US dollar is the reserve currency of the world (gold being the official currency). Here’s the part that we MUST understand if we are to survive this. The link between the dollar and gold was cut, not because of any of the reasons given (which don’t matter); it was cut because WE RAN OUT OF GOLD and someone at some point realized that there were more bank notes floating around that there was gold, not much, but just enough to blow the whole thing to kingdom come if anyone found out. They didn’t have to do it, they chose to do it because the alternative was to do what we’re going to have to do shortly: build a new economic infrastructure. They figures, what the heck? Nobody knew what was going on, it would take YEARS before the decision would begin to stink as it does today, so they cut the link between gold and the dollar and the wealth that was gold stopped at however much there still is. That did not stop us from propagating our species however and developing technology and adding more people every year to that exclusive club made up of people addicted to excess and other people’s envy. We continued forward and our economy GREW. (Screeching record sound) Wait a minute; didn’t I just say that we had run out of gold? How could our economy grow if there was no new gold? No new gold, no new money, remember? But there was new money. Crisp and freshly printed dollars were pouring out of the US mint and currencies all over the world continued to be incrementally printed and introduced into circulation. But how could anyone get away with this? It was easy, we printed money based on new gold that was BORROWED (it also didn’t exist, because there was no actual gold to borrow, that was just how they did the math). This fictitious quantity of borrowed gold didn’t exist; therefore the convertibility of paper currency to gold HAD to be cut – because there wasn’t enough gold, get it? This new “way” of printing money based on the assumption that if there were gold that could be borrowed, we would, but there isn’t, but we would if there were, so we’ll act as if we did and print money based on the value of this new DEBT. And there is was, that’s how the DEBT was born. We owe nobody approximately 52 trillion dollars worth of “borrowed” gold, which never existed but was used to print currency that was spent as legal tender. It was made possible because our banks created this money by issuing, buying and selling LOANS. In some part of our non-functioning brains, it could be said that these loans were what created the “borrowed gold”. At first, loans were made by banks with our deposits; yes, the loan that you had for your car or for anything, 25 to 30 years ago was actually other people’s money, deposited at the bank that gave us the loan. They had permission to do this and, after all, we weren’t using the money, we deposited it, remember? Very quickly however, the banks didn’t need our money, the money that they created by lending out our money and charging interest on it was re-deposited by the banks, and by the 1980’s, they didn’t need our deposits. They were making new money left and right, lending out larger and larger portions of this gold that doesn’t exist to themselves and then transacting money on that DEBT. Our governments told us, “don’t worry about it, we’re good for it, trust us.” Maybe this is why it’s called fiat currency, because fiat means “authority” in the dictionary (sic), but authority is the basis for credibility and credibility is the foundation of trust. You see, the root morpheme fiat also forms part of two words that came from Latin and are used by romance languages: confiar; which is Spanish for TRUST and fiar: which is also Spanish for TO EXTEND CREDIT TO, TO LEND. Wow, is all of this a coincidence? I don’t think so. Am I a conspiracy theorist?; hardly. This is simply what we did. When we ran out of gold and we borrowed the gold that we would need if the gold actually existed, but it didn’t, so the only way to get away with it was to treat the DEBT as real. This would make the “borrowed gold” real, as it were. And they did, and we bought it and theydid it more and we bent over and took it all.
This “debt” that took Greece and Italy from our world (because they are no more) is not real, but it is killing us and it might just succeed. Now if you’re thinking, if it’s not real, then it can’t kill us, then you get detention and here’s why. It’s like WATER.
WATER? Yes, water. We need water in order to survive. Without water, we die, quickly, of dehydration, this is a commonly known fact and the visual image that comes to mind is of a person in a hot and arid place like a desert, dropping dead from the thirst. Scratch that image for a moment and replace it with this one: You are in a life raft, floating in the ocean, lost and adrift. You are the sole survivor of a shipwreck and you’ve been out at sea for two days now, in the raft, in the sun with no provisions left. You start to get thirsty, very thirsty. You become delirious and suddenly you realize Wait a minute! I’m floating in an ocean of WATER! You laugh and you drink and drink and drink and 8 to 10 hours later, your kidneys shut down and you die, of what is essentially DEHYDRATION, because it’s not really WATER, it’s SALT WATER. Oh, they’re both wet, but the salt water is poison and will kill you. The DEBT is our salt water. We ran out of fresh water and just began drinking that salty debt water up in our delirium for more. If you can imagine some math to convert salt water to debt and establish a parallel between the time it takes salt water to kill a person and the time it will take the debt to kill what’s left of the human race, you could say that we’re in the 6th hour of the last 8 hours of our life as we know it. If we keep drinking the salt water for 2 more hours, we DIE, but if we stop drinking the fucking salt water we will have landed on a sandy beach with a beautiful fresh water spring nearby and we will LIVE.
I want to LIVE and I think that you do too. Please, stop drinking the salt water, it’s NOT REAL WATER. If we stop feeding this nightmare called the debt and stop believing that it’s real, then we can just throw away the civilization that we broke and BUILD ANOTHER ONE. After all, whose planet is this, ours or the debts?
We can do better.
ctwfrank
?!!!!??!!!
12 Nov 2011 3 Comments
in Humanity Tags: all, ctwfrank, culture, economics, future, history, humanity, Life, money, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, society, technonology, thoughts, writing
I stopped for a moment just now – stopped everything; the math, the work, the thinking, the labor. I stopped and stood up; straight as I could. I looked around and took a deep breath – just now, and I caught a glimpse of it. It’s tiny, faint and no more than a whisper, but it’s there alright. Can you see it? Can you smell it? I have no math for this, I’ve never actually seen anything like it so I’m going by what my gut; my human gut, is telling me – and it is familiar. It’s US. I am quite sure that I just saw the very first truly collective spark of pure human hope that I’ve ever seen – who knows, maybe it’s the first one ever, but that’s what it is! Heads up, brothers and sisters; look for it, it’s there – we can do this! We can do…better.
ctwfrank
That which has value
09 Nov 2011 7 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, economics, education, family, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, Life, linguistics, local, love, media, money, News, personal, philosophy, psychology, random, recipes, religion, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, videos, writing
The whole of human existence has become blindly obsessed with the issue of having possession of, if not the right to possess (by virtue of debt) those things that have value, specifically; money. No thing has any more or less value than what we assign it and it is woeful to contemplate that we would, individually or collectively, assign a higher value to any thing than what we reserve for ourselves, yet we have.
In the universe, there are only two values, these being the same ones we should concern ourselves with, lest we lose all reason and rationality: There is that which is TRUE and that which is FALSE and to count them as two values is only insofar as there are two different words to count, for they are in essence, opposite views of the same value; its validation and its negation. The only actual and real value that exists is truth which is simultaneously the only thing of value, yet we have come to value money more we value ourselves and even more than truth, and because of these we are all but lost in our own lie.
Untitleable
03 Nov 2011 1 Comment
in Humanity Tags: ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, education, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, irony, Life, linguistics, local, love, media, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, recipes, religion, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, video, videos, writing
It has always been generally considered that our modern globe-spanning Western Civilization chose Greece to be the place to herald its birth. Now, all of a sudden, it might just be that it also chose Greece to be the place where it lay down to die.
ctwfrank
I miss…
01 Nov 2011 3 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: allobservations, ctwfrank, future, humor, observations, society, thoughts
I miss…looking ahead to the future.
Playing the odds
20 Oct 2011 Leave a Comment
in Money Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, economics, education, family, film, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, irony, Life, linguistics, local, love, media, miscellaneous, money, movies, News, people, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, recipes, religion, reviews, technonology, thoughts, video, videos, writing
What we once mostly called the “economy” or at times the “financial infrastructure” at other times the “fiscal structure” and every once it a while we would call it the “banking structure” or the “commercial structure” of the world, or to be more general; the systematic functional management and administration of wealth and value – ended, or died, or disappeared or was replaced some time ago. It’s hard to pinpoint exactly when, but it doesn’t really matter at this point. If anyone might ask the question: “If this is true, then what has existed in its place since?” The answer to that would be a casino, with the only exception being that there is no house.
How to talk like THEM.
14 Oct 2011 1 Comment
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, economics, education, family, film, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, irony, Life, linguistics, local, love, media, miscellaneous, money, movies, News, people, peotry, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, religion, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, video, videos, writing
Have you ever wondered how they do it? I’m referring to any of THEM (or “they”, you know; the same ones who “say” – ‘They say the economy will get better.’) who stand in front of large groups of people and give speeches. It doesn’t have to be any particular one of them; it could be any one of them; politicians, corporate tycoons, millionaires, dictators and the like. How is it that they are able to stand up there for such a long time and talk as much as they do and say NOTHING at all, yet leave us in awe and impressed with the superlative oratory that we were fortunate enough to witness. How is it that they do it? They’re not THAT charismatic or charming or spellbinding, so how can so few talk so much crap and have it result in our applause, admiration, donations or votes? I’m not implying that an impressive and impacting discourse is never genuine, there are those who have the presence, power and passion to communicate a message to a large group of people and succeed with an impeccable power; it’s just there are far too many of them that don’t have any of these talents who manage to get away appearing as if they did every time they open their yapper and I think it’s about time a cat or two is let out of a bag or two. Impressive, impacting, breathtaking and moving speeches can be made by anyone, with the assistance of a little math. In this case; linguistic math. Would you like to learn how you can easily and simply give a knock-out speech that says absolutely nothing of any significance yet leaves the audience impressed, applauding and vowing life-long loyalty? Let’s have some fun.
Below is what I call a ‘linguistic speech matrix’. It breaks down key sections of sentences that contain words to which we are programmed from birth to respond to. This is no joke, try it and you will be blown away. The matrix is in the form of a table, with rows and columns. There are four columns, numbered 1 through 4 which represent sentence segments. These segments are interchangeable with other sentence segments containing the same component key words. The matrix also has several rows and these are indexed by letter, alphabetically (A, B, C, etc). Here’s how you use it: Starting with column 1, pick any row you like for the first part of what will be a 4-part sentence and then pick a different row for columns 2, 3 and 4 to form a sentence. For example; you can start off with F1, D2, G3 and E4. This gives you the following sentence, in this example the content of each cell has a different color font to help identify them: “The burden of daily life proves that the present structure of the organization facilitates the creation of new propositions.” Afterwards, simply continue mixing and matching columns and rows, as long as they are in column sequence 1-2-3-4. The more sentences you form, the longer and more impressive the speech sounds.
The matrix also has a bonus: it is flexible and adaptable so that it can mimic relevance. It accomplishes this with column 4, which contains the wording which is the pivotal object of the sentence. All of the rows in column 4 contain key words that sound important but mean nothing, however you can replace the words in column 4 from the matrix with something current, as long as it can follow “of” in terms of sentence structure. Let’s use the same example as above but in this case, we’ll replace what is in E4 with something current and on the minds of many people, like the economy. You can modify it like this: “The burden of daily life proves that the present structure of the organization facilitates the creation of a new global economic infrastructure.” You can insert relevant topics into the column 4 segment here and there and voila! You’ve just made a top notch, expert level and knock-their’s-socks-off-speech. Just imagine how much fun we could have with this knowledge! Give it a try, it’s the real deal. Now you not only know how to put together a world-class speech, you also have a tool to help you differentiate between an talented speaker and someone who is using a matrix: content. Maybe this will level the playing field some, who knows? Enjoy!
| row/column |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
A |
My fellow citizens, | In order to reach the goals of the program | We are obligated to perform a detailed analysis | of the existing financial and administrative conditions. |
|
B |
On the other hand and given the present circumstances | the complexity of analysis performed by management | plays an essential role in the structuring | of the development directives for the future. |
|
C |
Therefore. | the constant increase in the quality and quantity of our activities | demand exact precision and the complete support | of the main participating system. |
|
D |
Regardless, we can not forget that | the present structure of the organization | assists in the preparation and completion | of the member’s attitudes towards their unavoidable duties. |
|
E |
Similarly, | the new distribution of duties of the organization | guarantees the participation of an important group in the formation | of new propositions. |
|
F |
The burden of daily life proves that | the continuous development of different types of activities | complies with important obligations in the determination | of the learning curve, in terms of pogress. |
|
G |
It is not an absolute necessity to argue the complexity and the meaning of these problems, given that | our activity and progress in the areas of information and propaganda | facilitates the creation | of the structure of programs that relate to specific needs. |
|
H |
A diversified base of meaningful experiences teaches us that | the reinforcing and development of the structures | prevents the appreciation of the importance | of the conditions of the appropriate activities |
|
I |
It is the eagerness of the organization and also that | the advice of of several militants | offers us an interesting opportunity to test the validity | of the development model. |
|
J |
Superior ideological principles are what allow that | the beginnings of the process of forms the new attitudes which | implies the process of reconstruction and modernization | of the various types of action. |
|
K |
Additionally, we could very well dare to suggest that | a specific re-launching of all the implied sectors | will have to indicate an authentic starting point | of the basic premises as adopted. |
|
L |
It is obvious to point out that | that the overcoming of outmoded ways of thinking | will, in any case, specify the fundamental basis | of an actual wide-spectrum casuistry, |
|
M |
But we would commit the sin of insincerity if we were to avoid the fact that | an indiscriminate application of conclusive factors | assures us, in any case, of having a sensible investment process | of the resulting elements. |
|
N |
Finally, and as a definitive final statement, it is necessary to add that | the consensual process of various and other concurrent applications | is derived by overcoming the indirect occurrence | of a whole series of ideologically systematized criteria sharing a common front of regenerative acts. |
A most interesting modification to the solution of the global economic crisis…
11 Oct 2011 Leave a Comment
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, economics, education, family, film, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, irony, Life, linguistics, local, love, media, miscellaneous, money, movies, News, people, peotry, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, recipes, religion, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, video, videos, writing
I most definitely hope to be able to say that I “spoke too soon” if I waxed a bit too critical in yesterday’s post: The solution to the global economic crisis. I don’t have all of the details yet, but I just now learned that there is a “Global Insolvency and Restructuring Conference”. From what I have seen so far, these conferences are occurring at regular intervals, given that the web page I just looked at was about the 17th Global Insolvency and Restructuring Conference. Perhaps some of us are looking at possible ways to restructure after the present insolvency bottoms out, and at a good pace too! They’ve already had 17 of them! They must have these conferences on a weekly basis, or possibly on a monthly basis; the last 17 months have been the hardest so far.
What confuses me a little is that the web page for this conference lists the last one in May of 2011. There should have been at least 3 more since May, if not 12. It must be a typo; I mean, come on; there’s no way that this could have been the 17th annual Global Insolvency and Restructuring Conference, could it? That would mean that they have known about the insolvent state of the world for at least 17 years, perhaps more. That couldn’t be possible, could it? 17 years ago; in 1994; there was no clue that the massive hammer punch we took in 2008 would happen or that any of these economic “bubbles” that exploded would exist; right? I mean; if this were the 17th annual Global Insolvency and Restructuring Conference, then. . . have we been insolvent since then or did we know that we would become insolvent? Since 1994?
Excuse me for a moment, I just got a headache; I’m going to take an analgesic.
