A most interesting modification to the solution of the global economic crisis…
11 Oct 2011 Leave a Comment
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, economics, education, family, film, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, irony, Life, linguistics, local, love, media, miscellaneous, money, movies, News, people, peotry, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, recipes, religion, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, video, videos, writing
I most definitely hope to be able to say that I “spoke too soon” if I waxed a bit too critical in yesterday’s post: The solution to the global economic crisis. I don’t have all of the details yet, but I just now learned that there is a “Global Insolvency and Restructuring Conference”. From what I have seen so far, these conferences are occurring at regular intervals, given that the web page I just looked at was about the 17th Global Insolvency and Restructuring Conference. Perhaps some of us are looking at possible ways to restructure after the present insolvency bottoms out, and at a good pace too! They’ve already had 17 of them! They must have these conferences on a weekly basis, or possibly on a monthly basis; the last 17 months have been the hardest so far.
What confuses me a little is that the web page for this conference lists the last one in May of 2011. There should have been at least 3 more since May, if not 12. It must be a typo; I mean, come on; there’s no way that this could have been the 17th annual Global Insolvency and Restructuring Conference, could it? That would mean that they have known about the insolvent state of the world for at least 17 years, perhaps more. That couldn’t be possible, could it? 17 years ago; in 1994; there was no clue that the massive hammer punch we took in 2008 would happen or that any of these economic “bubbles” that exploded would exist; right? I mean; if this were the 17th annual Global Insolvency and Restructuring Conference, then. . . have we been insolvent since then or did we know that we would become insolvent? Since 1994?
Excuse me for a moment, I just got a headache; I’m going to take an analgesic.
A quick bit of reality.
10 Oct 2011 2 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, economics, education, family, film, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, irony, Life, linguistics, local, love, media, miscellaneous, money, News, people, peotry, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, recipes, religion, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, video, videos, writing
Foreword
The constitution prohibits the establishing of laws based on a religious belief or religious law; it is the fundamental basis of the separation of church and state. The constitution makes no such prohibition, nor virtually any other of any kind, to the private sector. That is to say that a private company can base its policies and procedures and/or operating guidelines on religious law and/or religious belief. This is guaranteed by the bill of rights (freedom of religion/freedom of speech).
The Meat and Potatoes:
The concept of “Lending Money” is one so absurd and ridiculous that it belies all logic, yet it is just one more “impossible” scenario that we make a part of our daily lives. Our civilization, as it stands in 2011 could not function at all without the lending of money, after all it is how money is created; you deposit your money in a bank, let’s say $1000.00. The bank, under the pretense that you will not withdraw that money immediately, can take a portion of it; let’s say $500.00 and lends it to someone else as if it were theirs and charges them interest on it. By accepting the loan from the bank (of your money) the beneficiary of the loan now has $500.00 dollars of your money that they bank lent them, but you also have the same $500.00 in your account; you’re just not using it right now. By doing this, the bank created $500.00 dollars, or at least that’s what we believe. In this post, I will not write any math intended to demonstrate how or why money can’t be borrowed or lent, because even though it can’t; we do it every day. In this post, I’ll stick to our present reality – to the last detail.
The lending of money is based on an analysis of credit risk. The function of credit risk analysis is to establish a person or entity’s creditworthiness. Creditworthiness is established by companies like FICO who assign a score in relation to a person’s creditworthiness. In order to determine this score, FICO’s slated objective is to predict the likelihood that a consumer will go 90 days past due or worse in the subsequent 24 months after the score has been calculated. Barring the fact that it is not possible to predict the future, the commercialization of predicting the future is officially classified as fortune-telling. Fortune telling is recognized in many states as a legitimate business as evidenced by the ability to obtain an occupational or business tax license to operate a fortune telling establishment (with a disclaimer that it is for entertainment purposes only). The reason that fortune-telling is classified as a legitimate business category is that fortune-telling is considered an aspect of witchcraft and witchcraft is officially recognized as a RELIGION in the U.S.A. and is therefore protected by the constitution.
In conclusion, even though the lives of every person in the country and most of the world, even governments are determined by their creditworthiness, there is no law regulating creditworthiness, credit scoring or credit rating, if there were, the law would be invalid because it would be based on a religious premise (witchcraft). At the same time, determining a person or company’s creditworthiness is technically an attempt to predict the future, which technically; is an act of witchcraft. When this is applied to the general public, we are able to glimpse our reality: Every person who has a loan, mortgage or credit card or in any way has borrowed money has (whether they know it or now) technically practiced witchcraft. There, that should light a fire or two under someone’s butt; they can’t argue the facts, however. Banks lend money by trying to predict the future of a person’s creditworthiness. The lending of money is the principal financial mechanism of the world’s economy; it is also the active practice of witchcraft, in reality.
It doesn’t get much more real than this.
We can do better.
The solution to the global economic crisis.
10 Oct 2011 2 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, economics, education, film, financial crisis, future, inspiration, Life, local, love, media, miscellaneous, money, movies, News, people, personal, philosophy, politics, random, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, video, writing
I don’t understand what all of the fuss is about. The entire world feels like it’s on the verge of a mass nervous breakdown over this “global economic crisis”. So severe is this crisis that those few who actually know how bad it is will never divulge as much – and I am not one of those few; which may result my being asked how I can quantify “it” in any way. The answer to all of these questions is actually very simple: There is no financial “crisis” or a global “recession” or anything even remotely resembling the significant “slowing down” of the planet’s economy. According to the very authorities who define everything financial or economic; such as the IMF, the U.S. Federal Reserve, the World Bank and the rest of the endless list of “entities in charge” of everything related to monney; the present financial position of the human race stands as follows, using the basic, standardized, universal and official format called A BALANCE SHEET (expressed in US Dollars “US$”, as required, given that the official reserve currency of the world is the U.S. Dollar, as per the Breton-Woods Agreement, which is still being honored by recognizing gold as the official currency of the world):
Balance sheet for Homo-Sapiens as of October 10, 2011
Fiscal year-end: December 31, 2011
Total Assets: US$32 Trillion
Total Liabilities: US$84 Trillion
___________________________________
Total Assets and
Liabilities: -US$52 Trillion
(The figures may not be exact, but they are close enough to be verifiable by any person through any number of official sources.)
As can be seen by our balance sheet, we have no economic crisis or recession; whenever ones’ liabilities are greater than one’s assets, especially to the degree seen in our collective balance sheet, it is called INSOLVENCY. It’s in the dictionary, you can look it up. It’s actually pretty clear; I don’t know how every “expert” in the world missed it. On an individual basis, if any one person should become insolvent, the pestilence that is rained upon them is truly harsh, to the point where they must file for bankruptcy, after all; isn’t not being able to pay one’s bills one of the most despicable and shameful of all social positions? This is why it’s called “insolvency” – without a solution. These days, most people are forced to deal with coercive threats and more if they are 3 days in paying a credit card statement and yet the entire human race is clearly and indisputably insolvent, and no one noticed? I don’t know, but doesn’t that seem a little odd? That’s beside the point, however; I don’t want to lose my place, where were we? Oh yes, the inhabitants of Planet Earth are summarily and collectively insolvent; a fact which needs no further supporting evidence. As such, what is required is that bankruptcy be filed, humanity’s existing assets and cash flow would probably be placed in receivership and eventually the court will discharge the debt by virtue of liquidation of assets, or something of the sort, right? Those are the RULES; right? That’s what any of us would be required to do individually, RIGHT? If it applies to any person individually, then it must also apply to all of us collectively, given the same circumstances, RIGHT???
Here are the problems with this situation:
- Which court has jurisdiction over the entire human race?
- Assuming an answer for #1, to which address should all legal paperwork be sent?
- Who (and this is most important) speaks for all of us? ALL of us; because it is all of us together who are bankrupt and insolvent. Those few who may still think they “have a few bucks” can’t weasel their way out of being human, so it’s ALL of us, just look at the numbers. Who could, or can, speak for all of us, should this impossible hearing ever take place? That’s simple: All of us did not make, or even participate in the decisions as to the handling our global economy that resulted in insolvency. It was only some of us who did so. The fact that they didn’t get permission from all of us is irrelevant at this point; we believe the figures as written, therefore we are insolvent. It would seem logical that it should be those same few who put all of us in this position who should stand up for the rest of us in this case – they did when they screwed up our books. Wouldn’t you say?
Okay, I think that’s enough. None of these things are actually going to happen. All of us don’t even know who those few who put us all in this position are, or were. It’s ridiculous to consider that the “human race” could file for bankruptcy, yet this doesn’t change the fact that we are bankrupt and insolvent. We can’t play by some of the rules and ignore the rest when it’s convenient. If humanity can’t file bankruptcy, then it can’t be insolvent either; why? Because we INVENTED both of those concepts, yet we believe them to be real and true individual “things” with their own will and presence.
What is truly comical to the point of being Machiavellian is how we have known this all along. Of course we have, just look in the dictionary. Look up the word “insolvent”. The entire definition deals with money and bankruptcy. From a linguistic point of view, however, the word insolvent is composed of two component morphemes; the prefix in-, which means NOT, and the word solvent, which of course, means everything that’s listed under the word insolvency, except for that one little detail that jumps out at you if you actually look up the word solvent: It also means “having the power to solve”. Of course, that makes sense, doesn’t it? Then why doesn’t the definition for insolvent include “The inability to solve?” Maybe because when it comes to solving this mess, we are unable to. Shit, we can’t even solve the right definition. The entire financial crisis, wealth, value, currency, money and everything else isn’t even real, we just think it is which makes it real to all of us. In the end, what this all means is that we are actually trying to run an insolvent civilization on a bankrupt planet and that somehow a solution will be found for making something out of nothing? Look at it this way; each day that we continue to live believing this enormous pile of shit that came out of us is like driving a car with 4 flat tires; fast and a long way. You know what happens eventually, right?
Okay, just don’t say I didn’t speak up.
We can do better.
Why?
09 Oct 2011 Leave a Comment
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, economics, education, family, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, Life, linguistics, local, love, media, miscellaneous, News, people, peotry, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, recipes, religion, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, video, videos, writing
Q: Why are there many of us?
A: Because it is necessary, otherwise there would be only 1.
Can you Imagine?
04 Oct 2011 Leave a Comment
in Money Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, economics, education, family, film, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, irony, Life, linguistics, local, love, media, miscellaneous, money, movies, News, people, peotry, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, recipes, religion, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, video, videos, writing
If all the world’s women suddenly declared that they would only have sex with men that have six testicles in their one scrotum, and everyone believed it; no one would have any more sex and the human race would disappear within a generation.
If the last step of purchasing a new car were to precisely recite the smell of the color blue, as dictated by an Ancient Eskimo Chief to his son, who died without keeping a record of the description, and everyone believed it; no new cars would be sold.
If the world’s financial authorities declared that the sum total value of all money, gold, silver and other wealth possessed by all of the people on the planet totaled $34 Trillion and that the total amount of debt owed by all of the people on the planet was valued at $84 trillion, and everyone believed it, then money and wealth would be meaningless and worthless, no one would ever actually be able to own anything and everything in life would be measured by what you owe instead of what you are.
Oh shit, wait a minute. That last one’s an actual fact.
Excuse me….again
26 Sep 2011 1 Comment
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, economics, education, family, film, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, irony, Life, linguistics, local, love, media, miscellaneous, money, movies, News, people, peotry, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, recipes, religion, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, video, videos, writing
Just for the sake of argument, let’s just say that the $84 trillion debt figure is real (LOL). Let’s also say that I wanted to settle that debt, the whole thing, for everyone, and that I had the money with which to do it. This being the case; who would I make the check out to?
It’s just a bombastic question, but a curious one to contemplate.
Excuse me, but…
24 Sep 2011 4 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, ctwfrank, dailies, economics, education, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, irony, Life, linguistics, media, miscellaneous, money, movies, News, people, peotry, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, recipes, religion, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, video, videos, writing
Here’s a simple question with an impossible answer: The IMF, The Federal Reserve and every official entity in the world agree that the total amount of debt that exists in the world is approximately $84 Trillion. By the same token, they also establish that the total amount of wealth in the world is approximately $34 Trillion. Regardless of the exact precision on the numbers; how is it possible that we can owe more than what there actually is?
Or is someone just messing with our heads?
The way it is.
09 Sep 2011 Leave a Comment
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: ctwfrank, future, humanity, humor, Life, people, philosophy, psychology, society, thoughts
In the end, no one; not one single person deserves anything at all; we have to earn it and one way or another, we do. We don’t know why, but we all know that it’s just the way it is.
Just for the record…
16 Aug 2011 Leave a Comment
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, business, culture, dailies, economics, education, family, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, irony, Life, money, movies, News, people, peotry, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, recipes, reviews, society, thoughts, video, videos, writing
Intelligence is a choice, not a super-power.
WORLD WORDPLAY
29 Jul 2011 Leave a Comment
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, business, culture, dailies, design, economics, education, family, film, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, humor, Life, linguistics, local, love, media, miscellaneous, money, movies, News, people, peotry, personal, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, recipes, religion, reviews, society, technonology, thoughts, video, videos, writing
cre·den·tial
[kri-den-shuhl]
–noun
- Usually, credentials. Evidence of authority, status, rights, entitlement to privileges, or the like, usually in written form: Only those with the proper credentials are admitted.
- anything that provides the basis for confidence, belief, credit, etc.
The only thing that any credential can give true evidence of is that a financial transaction occurred.
