Knowledge
07 Apr 2012 6 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, ctwfrank, culture, economics, family, humanity, Life, linguistics, News, people, politics, random, society, technonology, thoughts
Understanding is the human mechanism that transforms information into knowledge.
Behold!
02 Apr 2012 3 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: blog, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, economics, family, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, Life, linguistics, News, philosophy, psychology, random, society, thoughts, writing
(Preamble: I’m still here!)“Behold: man. Poor, foolish creature. We humans are the only living organism (that we know of), able to gather up all of the information in the world and put it in a box. Then, after finishing, we sat in front of the box and looked at it – and got information confused with knowledge. On a planet where ignorance has been the status quo, such a thing could happen. So now, instead of a planet populated with uneducated poor people serving the handful who got a clue first, we are a planet of idiots with boxes full of information who think that this makes them educated and knowledgeable. I am a human, these are my people. Humanity has come full circle, from being jesters to graduating as full-fledged clowns.”
We can do better.
I Beg to Defer
11 Feb 2012 Leave a Comment
in Humanity Tags: ctwfrank, culture, future, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, Life, linguistics, News, philosophy, reviews, society, technonology, writing
I’m not supposed to write while I’m writing, but this was irresistible. Today, my five-year old daughter asked me a very interesting question after her daily communication session with me. Most people would probably laugh if they were to actually observe any one of these sessions and attempt to correct my perceived misspeak by saying; “Communication what? You’re just teaching her English!” English? Now that’s funny! What’s English? I’m not sure that I would recognize actual English if I heard it, in fact it’s hard to pinpoint exactly when we warped and twisted what used to be referred to as ”The King’s English” into the absurd jargon that we call English today. I most definitely am not teaching my daughter English, to me that would be like teaching one’s own child where to stab a person so that it kills or where it only causes trauma: it would be perverse. I’m teaching my daughter how to communicate with other people; one certainly can’t communicate with another person by using English! Everyone knows that you only use English to confuse or antagonize others but never to communicate; that’s what money is for. Do you see? You’re already paying more attention at its mere mention.
Apologies, I digress; back to the point, namely my daughter’s question, which was: “Dad; if the prefix in- means “not”, then why does the dictionary say that the word “indifference” means to not care or to consider something unimportant? That’s not what “not-difference, or not-different” means. According to the rules, indifference should mean that there is no difference in something – like when making a comparison, even though it’s easier to just say that one thing is the same as another instead of saying that it’s indifferent from another –that sounds like too much work! So what’s the word that should be used to mean that someone doesn’t care? There’s got to be a word, Dad! This doesn’t make any sense!”
A few minutes later; after the pride, amazement and wonder subsided a bit, I contemplated the question and replied;
“You’re right, honey; it doesn’t make any sense. That’s because it is the wrong word, just as you figured. The word that should appear in the dictionary in the same place where you now see “indifference” is “indeference”. The problem is that if you try to look up the word “indeference”, you won’t find it because it is a ‘forgotten word’; we simply forgot, for some reason, and replaced it with “indifference”, maybe because they sound sort of the same, who knows? In this case the formative prefix in- is added to a noun to form another noun representing the effect of a negative force on the original word. The word “deference” means ‘to show respectful courtesy” as to character or to be ‘respectfully submissive” as to a point of conversation or debate. When the prefix in- is added, the result should be “indeference”, but that word doesn’t exist in the dictionary; instead the definition of “indeference” is what appears as the definition of “indifference”; which means some else entirely. Do you understand now, sweetie?”
She looked at me with eyes that would make Puss-n-Boots envious and then she asked me:
“Buy why, Dad? Why would we do something like that?”
I sighed, and with compassion and clarity, I answered my daughter’s question:
“Because in the end, sweetie, we are nothing more than a bunch of punk-assed sissy bitches and straight-out pussies who would gladly admit that shit and shinola are the same, as long as they didn’t have to get up or do any thinking. The human race has become but a sad whimper when compared to our potential and we forget words just like we forget to care or to participate. It’s possible that humanity has forgotten so many things that no one believes that they can make a difference anymore.”
My daughter looked me straight in the eyes and lit up with awe and understanding. She jumped up and down and with jubilation and excitement shouted:
“Of course! That’s it, Dad! Now I understand! We just got the words mixed up! “Indifference” should mean ‘to not be able to make a difference’ and perhaps everyone feels that way because they forgot that feeling that way IS indifference and what they thought was indifference is actually indeference! Right, Dad?”
It was my turn to be awe-struck. I couldn’t decide if it was just the innocence of a child or flawless logic that inspired my little girl and it really didn’t matter, she blew me away. All I could do was to look at her and say: “Maybe, sweetie; it just might be exactly that.”
She served up that look again; its power is irresistible and with every ounce of strength she could muster, she made the “please” gesture with her hands and said:
“So why don’t’ you just explain that to everyone, Dad? You’re the best explainer in the whole world! Every time you explain something to me, I understand it right away! Please, Daddy, everything will be okay if you just explain this to everyone!”
So I am.
Thank you, honey, for helping me to remember what it means to be human. I love you.
ctwfrank
Maybe it’s about time…
28 Jan 2012 2 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, blog, books, culture, financial crisis, humanity, linguistics, local, philosophy, poetry, politics, psychology, society
Hi everyone. It’s been almost a month since I’ve posted – there is a reason for that and I promise to share the details, but that’s not for this post. This post has a different purpose – purpose. I’ve never been one to cite from other writers very much but I will now because this is no ordinary writer; this is, just as its subject: poetry in motion. I don’t know if a man has ever cited the following, if so, then I’m simply the next one but if I am the first, then it’s about time! Let this fill you:
Phenomenal Woman.
Pretty women wonder where my secret lies.
I’m not cute or built to suit a fashion model’s size
But when I start to tell them,
They think I’m telling lies.
I say,
It’s in the reach of my arms
The span of my hips,
The stride of my step,
The curl of my lips.
I’m a woman
Phenomenally.
Phenomenal woman,
That’s me.
I walk into a room
Just as cool as you please,
And to a man,
The fellows stand or
Fall down on their knees.
Then they swarm around me,
A hive of honey bees.
I say,
It’s the fire in my eyes,
And the flash of my teeth,
The swing in my waist,
And the joy in my feet.
I’m a woman
Phenomenally.
Phenomenal woman,
That’s me.
Men themselves have wondered
What they see in me.
They try so much
But they can’t touch
My inner mystery.
When I try to show them
They say they still can’t see.
I say,
It’s in the arch of my back,
The sun of my smile,
The ride of my breasts,
The grace of my style.
I’m a woman
Phenomenally.
Phenomenal woman,
That’s me.
Now you understand
Just why my head’s not bowed.
I don’t shout or jump about
Or have to talk real loud.
When you see me passing
It ought to make you proud.
I say,
It’s in the click of my heels,
The bend of my hair,
the palm of my hand,
The need of my care,
‘Cause I’m a woman
Phenomenally.
Phenomenal woman,
That’s me.
Maya Angelou – the one and only.
(My daughter; Maya. has some big shoes to fill).
ctwfrank
Change
29 Dec 2011 1 Comment
in Humanity Tags: all, blog, ctwfrank, culture, economics, education, family, Life, linguistics, miscellaneous, money, News, people, philosophy, psychology, random, reviews, society, thoughts, writing
Change [cheynj]
Source: Dictionary.com Unabridged
verb (used with object)
- to make the form, nature, content, future course, etc., of (something) different from what it is or from what it would be if left alone: to change one’s name; to change one’s opinion; to change the course of history.
- to transform or convert (usually followed by into ): The witch changed the prince into a toad.
- to substitute another or others for; exchange for something else, usually of the same kind: She changed her shoes when she got home from the office.
- to give and take reciprocally; interchange: to change places with someone.
- to transfer from one (conveyance) to another: You’ll have to change planes in Chicago.
- to give or get smaller money in exchange for: to change a five-dollar bill.
- to give or get foreign money in exchange for: to change dollars into francs.
- to remove and replace the covering or coverings of: to change a bed; to change a baby.
verb (used without object)
- to become different: Overnight the nation’s mood changed.
- to become altered or modified: Colors change if they are exposed to the sun.
- to become transformed or converted (usually followed by into ): The toad changed into a prince again.
- to pass gradually into (usually followed by to or into ): Summer changed to autumn.
- to make a change or an exchange: If you want to sit next to the window, I’ll change with you.
- to transfer between trains or other conveyances: We can take the local and change to an express at the next stop.
- to change one’s clothes: She changed into jeans.
- (of the moon) to pass from one phase to another.
- (of the voice) to become deeper in tone; come to have a lower register: The boy’s voice began to change when he was thirteen.
- the act or fact of changing; fact of being changed.
- a transformation or modification; alteration: They noticed the change in his facial expression.
- a variation or deviation: a change in the daily routine.
- the substitution of one thing for another: We finally made the change to an oil-burning furnace.
- variety or novelty: Let’s try a new restaurant for a change.
- the passing from one place, state, form, or phase to another: a change of seasons; social change.
- Jazz . harmonic progression from one tonality to another; modulation.
- the supplanting of one thing by another.
- anything that is or may be substituted for another.
- a fresh set of clothing.
- money given in exchange for an equivalent of higher denomination.
- a balance of money that is returned when the sum tendered in payment is larger than the sum due.
- coins of low denomination.
- any of the various sequences in which a peal of bells may be rung.
- Also, ‘change. British . exchange ( def. 10 ) .
- Obsolete . changefulness; caprice.
Verb phrase
- change off,
- to take turns with another, as at doing a task.
- to alternate between two tasks or between a task and a rest break.
Idioms
- change front, Military . to shift a military force in another direction.
- change hands. hand ( def. 47 ) .
- change one’s mind, to change one’s opinions or intentions.
- ring the changes,
- to perform all permutations possible in ringing a set of tuned bells, as in a bell tower of a church. T
- o vary the manner of performing an action or of discussing a subject; repeat with variations.
Origin:
1175–1225; (v.) Middle English cha ( u ) ngen < Anglo-French, Old French changer < Late Latin cambiāre, Latin cambīre to exchange; (noun) Middle English cha ( u ) nge < Anglo-French, Old French, noun derivative of the v.
Synonyms
1. transmute, transform; vary, mutate; amend, modify. Change, alter both mean to make a difference in the state or condition of a thing or to substitute another state or condition. To change is to make a material difference so that the thing is distinctly different from what it was: to change one’s opinion. To alter is to make some partial change, as in appearance, but usually to preserve the identity: to alter a dress ( to change a dress would mean to put on a different one).
3. replace, trade.
4. trade.
7. convert.
10. vary, mutate, amend.
18. transmutation, mutation, conversion, vicissitude.
21. exchange.
25, 26. replacement.
Antonyms
10. remain. 18. permanence.
change (tʃeɪndʒ)
Source: Collins World English Dictionary
— vb (sometimes foll by to or into ) (when intr, may be foll by into or out of )
- to make or become different; alter
- ( tr ) to replace with or exchange for another: to change one’s name
- to transform or convert or be transformed or converted
- to give and receive (something) in return; interchange: to change places with someone
- ( tr ) to give or receive (money) in exchange for the equivalent sum in a smaller denomination or different currency
- ( tr ) to remove or replace the coverings of: to change a baby
- to put on other clothes
- ( intr ) (of the moon) to pass from one phase to the following one
- to operate (the gear lever of a motor vehicle) in order to alter the gear ratio: to change gear
- to alight from (one bus, train, etc) and board another
- change face to rotate the telescope of a surveying instrument through 180° horizontally and vertically, taking a second sighting of the same object in order to reduce error
- informal change feet to put on different shoes, boots, etc
- change front
- military to redeploy (a force in the field) so that its main weight of weapons points in another direction
- to alter one’s attitude, opinion, etc
- change hands to pass from one owner to another
- change one’s mind to alter one’s decision or opinion
- change one’s tune to alter one’s attitude or tone of speech
-n - the act or fact of changing or being changed
- a variation, deviation, or modification
- the substitution of one thing for another; exchange
- anything that is or may be substituted for something else
- variety or novelty (esp in the phrase for a change ): I want to go to France for a change
- a different or fresh set, esp of clothes
- money given or received in return for its equivalent in a larger denomination or in a different currency
- the balance of money given or received when the amount tendered is larger than the amount due
- coins of a small denomination regarded collectively
- archaic ( often capital ) a place where merchants meet to transact business; an exchange
- the act of passing from one state or phase to another
- the transition from one phase of the moon to the next
- the order in which a peal of bells may be rung
- sport short for changeover
- slang desirable or useful information
- obsolete fickleness or caprice
- change of heart a profound change of outlook, opinion, etc
- slang get no change out of someone not to be successful in attempts to exploit or extract information from someone
- ring the changes to vary the manner or performance of an action that is often repeated
[C13: from Old French changier, from Latin cambīre to exchange, barter]
Word Origin & History
change
early 13c., from O.Fr. changier, from L.L. cambiare, from L. cambire “to exchange, barter,” of Celtic origin, from PIE base *kamb- “to bend, crook.” The financial sense of “balance returned when something is paid for” is first recorded 1620s. Phrase change of heart is from 1828.
Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper
Slang Dictionary
change definition
n.
money. (See also and change.) : It takes a lot of change to buy a car like that.
Dictionary of American Slang and Colloquial Expressions by Richard A. Spears.Fourth Edition.
Copyright 2007. Published by McGraw Hill.
Notes:
Dictionaries are so cool; they’re keepers. Look at the slang definition!
Now, you know what it is, there’s no need to be afraid of it.
ctwfrank
Understanding what we say.
28 Dec 2011 Leave a Comment
in Wordplay Tags: all, ctwfrank, culture, design, economics, financial crisis, future, humanity, Life, linguistics, News, reviews, society, thoughts, writing
Several times a day, sometimes more, I’ll read somewhere or hear from someone that “the real estate market is bouncing back” or that “home prices are stabilizing” or some other similarly sounding statement. Interestingly, it’s always accompanied by a burst of emotion that I can only compare to lust. This is, as I understand, what many of us want, I guess it’s supposed to make us feel safe in the face of the change we are experiencing – something that can only be called “self-genocide” (sic) and that “things will return to normal”, where “normal” is that little tiny corner of a closet somewhere in this world where most of us allow ourselves to be kept against our will, fed a diet of bullshit and sugar and given 20 lashes whenever any one of us generates an original thought.
I wonder if any of the people who make statements like this have any idea of what they are actually saying. It’s no different than having someone – anyone – walk up to you and proclaim with excitement and glee: “Hey! Did you hear? Slavery is becoming popular again, it just might make a comeback!” Yes, slavery is what I compared this to.
…What was that?
…Am I a communist?
LOL. Of course I’m not a communist, silly; there’s no such thing, besides, none of the “isms” work, remember?
…Why do I write this, you ask?
I write this because it’s simply the truth. Of all of shit that we’ve done to ourselves in the last 12,000 years of “civilization”, the only thing shittier than giving someone a “mortgage” would be to sell them as a slave. Nothing else that we’ve done comes even close to being as unacceptably fucked up than to sell people, against their will, as property. The mortgage, however, is a real contender for the title; it forces someone who may want a home of their own to buy the money required to pay for it at $10.00-$20.00 for every $1.00, (i.e.: Hi! I’ll sell you a dollar for ten dollars) over the average 30 year term. This, of course, is crowned with the “cherry” of letting mortgage-holders speed up time and sell a mortgage, at maturity value, within 24 hours of issuing it. This is one of the things that got us here.
Imaginary omnipotence is incredible, isn’t it?
Think about it, it’s about time we did, wouldn’t you say?
We can do better.
ctwfrank
A reflection
27 Dec 2011 Leave a Comment
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: business, ctwfrank, culture, economics, financial crisis, future, humanity, humor, Life, linguistics, money, News, politics, society, thoughts, writing
While reflecting on the events of the last year while I write the math for 2012, I recalled a detail that could also be considered a statistic. Several different times during 2011 different people from different places in the world and from different backgrounds and in some cases having nothing more in common with each other than the fact that they are human, said this same exact thing to me, in the same exact way and in the same exact context:
“Between 2002 and 2006, everyone was rich.”
Spooky, isn’t it?
ctwfrank
An observation as to death
17 Dec 2011 3 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: all, art, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, dailies, design, economics, education, family, history, humanity, humor, inspiration, linguistics, observations, philosophy, random, thoughts, writing
“I fear not death, nor the fact that it will, one day, visit me; but I cannot bear even the thought of not living.”
ctwfrank
A different kind of math.
10 Dec 2011 6 Comments
in OBSERVATIONS Tags: articles, blog, ctwfrank, culture, economics, financial crisis, future, history, humanity, irony, linguistics, News, philosophy, politics, psychology, random, society, thoughts, writing
I do not now, nor have I ever subscribed to or validated the concept of ethnicity in any way, because the math says it is irrelevant to the human condition. This is also why I have never written any math that takes ethnicity into account as a legitimate variable; as I have said before: “There is no them, there’s only us.”
This is now how everyone else thinks, however. The one only human construct more absurd and utterly evil than the word ethnicity is what was born from it: racism. That’s all I have to say about that. In spite of this, ethnicity looks like it might be a factor in the impending, inevitable and imminent change that we must all navigate to the human condition. This does not change the fact that the word and its mutated offspring are unacceptable, it simply means that I wrote this single and solitary post from the perspective that we gave those words. If it sounds contradictory to what you just read; it’s not; it’s just a different kind of math but it’s just as true and valid as all the math. It is the same math that says that even though only about 40 people will undoubtedly understand what follows, (they will all definitely read this post) there’s a possibility than many others will understand it as well. That would be a good thing, and it’s time for some good things. Following is the only math I will ever include in the Catalogue of Calculations that is in any way based on ethnicity. I won’t explain this math, I’ll let you figure it out; it may just be the only atom of value that exists when it comes to ethnicity.
The single biggest honor that as ever been bestowed on me in the whole of my life actually happened several times: the same honor, bestowed by several different people at different times, who all genuinely treated me, and continue to treat me, as a black man.
That says it all.
ctwfrank
…and while we’re on the subject of GOLD
01 Dec 2011 4 Comments
in Money Tags: all, articles, blog, books, business, ctwfrank, culture, design, economics, education, family, financial crisis, history, humanity, Life, linguistics, local, miscellaneous, money, movies, News, people, personal, philosophy, random, reviews, society, thoughts, writing
Okay, let’s continue being serious for a moment about GOLD. The gold phenomenon, as I like to call it, is very closely tied to the events that led to where we are today, which can accurately be described as a cluster fuck, but on a planetary scale. If we take this disease that is killing the human race (because our idiocy has become a disease) and boil it down to the simplest possible explanation, it would be this: When we developed trade and commerce and an economy, it was good – very good; we shouldn’t forget that the human race went from being little more than a handful of half-starved nomads always moving and looking for food to having excesses, luxuries, slaves, titles, position and properties in the span of a couple of thousand years. After 250,000 years of looking for food and water all the time, this was the blink of an eye. Civilization, as it were, was gourmet fare for the human ego, which ate it up with gusto; the way only we can: by gorging on what felt good now without giving a second thought as to…well, as to anything. We just kept heading in the direction of MORE! Why should anyone think that we could run out of anything – the first 3,000-4,000 years after the Neolithic revolution was phat! There was plenty for everyone, in fact we wouldn’t come up with the concept of poverty for some time; remember, you have to be free to be poor and you would be surprised at the percentage of the human race that were slaves and for how long. We acted without thinking, planning or considering the consequences. Doesn’t that sound familiar? It was the same 12,000 years ago. We may have airplanes and computers but we have not curtailed our insatiable appetite for irresponsibility by even a little. You can count on a human being to fuck something up, and that we did, especially when we picked a metal: gold, to be the raw material for this new thing we called MONEY. Money was such an incredibly addictive and irresistible goodie that it simply froze our minds. No one and I mean no one thought about or worried about what we would do when we ran out of gold. Maybe there was some ignorance involved, but anyone who has ever been in charge of anything since we’ve had money had to have known that people multiplied, quickly, but not gold, in fact every year, it became just a tiny bit more difficult to find new gold. We didn’t need to pinpoint a specific year, but just knowing that at some point in the future it just wouldn’t work anymore because there would be more people needing to use money than there was gold to be money was enough to act on. It’s typical of us. Right now, even at this stage of our descent into who-knows-what, if by some chance a huge asteroid made of pure gold were to pass within range of our rockets and we lassoed that planet-sized nugget of the stuff that dreams are made of, anchored it to the moon, took its measurements, and started to figure out exactly how much hold was on the asteroid, we would get to “more than what we need right now” and just stop counting. Why bother? We hit our nut! We filled up the hole that we made! We would, and we all know it. We would have gold orgies and the filthy rich would become indescribably rich and be happy, and the poor and downtrodden would still be poor and downtrodden but happy because they would still have that shitty job that barely paid them enough to live on – the one that they lost at some point between 3 years ago and today. We would continue to ignore half of all of us – the ones that there was never enough for in the first place and they would continue to starve to death because even though our own stupidity is killing us, we don’t want to change because change requires thinking and actual work and those things make our brains hurt – unless there’s money involved.
So we ignored the math and based our wealth on gold. Fine, so how did the whole wealth thing work? How was new money made? Up until possibly the 1960’s (that’s a guess, but I think a good one) for there to be new money, there had to be new wealth. This requires a quick recap of the history of human wealth. If you recall, the wealth of the world and of nations had always been food, which may very well remain as the only real thing of value in human history, and then we came up with the concept of money to use as a medium of exchange because it was simply too cumbersome and tedious to trade in food directly. We chose gold as the material from which we would make the money that would represent the wealth (food) and be much easier to carry and transact since it is a soft metal and easily formed into coins. Then we got so used to dealing and transacting gold, that we forgot it only represented wealth and, just as Aristotle warned, we confused it with wealth – but no one said anything, we just took it as a given that gold was the wealth of the world and when food came up in conversation, it would quickly be referred to as a commodity, usually in the futures market – yes, futures, as in; not yesterday or today, but the future, you know that thing that we can not predict but for some strange reason can buy and sell. This continued and evolved until trade and commerce became so widespread (because we love to fuck and reproduce like rabbits) that a sub-category of money had to be created: currency (including paper money). The first bank notes appeared sometime in the 16th century of thereabouts, in Scandinavia (That’s an interesting story, remind me to write about it sometime.) and it caught on quickly. By the 19th century, paper money was in common used and was valued at par with gold because they were redeemable for gold at just about any bank. During all this time, gold was wealth. Paper notes were portable representations of gold and therefore notes were only printed based on how much gold there was. At some point we realized that the amount of gold was finite; that’s when wealth became a privilege and we began to acquire it by using war or theft or fraud, you know good old fashioned proven techniques. Then, all of a sudden, just like that: there was no more new gold. That was it. All the money there was, was all the money there was, but the human progress train didn’t notice, it kept right on going. Oh Shit! What do we do now! There’s no more gold to make more money! If people find out, it will be a freaking disaster! What to do? What to do? It didn’t take us very long, we figured: what the heck, if we’ve screwed the pooch, then let’s screw it properly! Nobody said anything, not a word, then, suddenly (and I mean suddenly) in August of 1972, the President of the United States of America went on the air (TV and radio) early in the morning, before the markets opened and rattled off a list of “executive decisions” which included: “a 90 day freeze on prices and wages, an immediate 10% import surtax and the severing of the link between the dollar and gold (meaning that one could no longer want into a Federal Reserve bank with a $20 and walk out with however much gold that got them). It got a little attention at the time, it’s getting A LOT of attention now. That single act literally killed the concept that we know as money. The price of gold was fixed in dollars and the US dollar is the reserve currency of the world (gold being the official currency). Here’s the part that we MUST understand if we are to survive this. The link between the dollar and gold was cut, not because of any of the reasons given (which don’t matter); it was cut because WE RAN OUT OF GOLD and someone at some point realized that there were more bank notes floating around that there was gold, not much, but just enough to blow the whole thing to kingdom come if anyone found out. They didn’t have to do it, they chose to do it because the alternative was to do what we’re going to have to do shortly: build a new economic infrastructure. They figures, what the heck? Nobody knew what was going on, it would take YEARS before the decision would begin to stink as it does today, so they cut the link between gold and the dollar and the wealth that was gold stopped at however much there still is. That did not stop us from propagating our species however and developing technology and adding more people every year to that exclusive club made up of people addicted to excess and other people’s envy. We continued forward and our economy GREW. (Screeching record sound) Wait a minute; didn’t I just say that we had run out of gold? How could our economy grow if there was no new gold? No new gold, no new money, remember? But there was new money. Crisp and freshly printed dollars were pouring out of the US mint and currencies all over the world continued to be incrementally printed and introduced into circulation. But how could anyone get away with this? It was easy, we printed money based on new gold that was BORROWED (it also didn’t exist, because there was no actual gold to borrow, that was just how they did the math). This fictitious quantity of borrowed gold didn’t exist; therefore the convertibility of paper currency to gold HAD to be cut – because there wasn’t enough gold, get it? This new “way” of printing money based on the assumption that if there were gold that could be borrowed, we would, but there isn’t, but we would if there were, so we’ll act as if we did and print money based on the value of this new DEBT. And there is was, that’s how the DEBT was born. We owe nobody approximately 52 trillion dollars worth of “borrowed” gold, which never existed but was used to print currency that was spent as legal tender. It was made possible because our banks created this money by issuing, buying and selling LOANS. In some part of our non-functioning brains, it could be said that these loans were what created the “borrowed gold”. At first, loans were made by banks with our deposits; yes, the loan that you had for your car or for anything, 25 to 30 years ago was actually other people’s money, deposited at the bank that gave us the loan. They had permission to do this and, after all, we weren’t using the money, we deposited it, remember? Very quickly however, the banks didn’t need our money, the money that they created by lending out our money and charging interest on it was re-deposited by the banks, and by the 1980’s, they didn’t need our deposits. They were making new money left and right, lending out larger and larger portions of this gold that doesn’t exist to themselves and then transacting money on that DEBT. Our governments told us, “don’t worry about it, we’re good for it, trust us.” Maybe this is why it’s called fiat currency, because fiat means “authority” in the dictionary (sic), but authority is the basis for credibility and credibility is the foundation of trust. You see, the root morpheme fiat also forms part of two words that came from Latin and are used by romance languages: confiar; which is Spanish for TRUST and fiar: which is also Spanish for TO EXTEND CREDIT TO, TO LEND. Wow, is all of this a coincidence? I don’t think so. Am I a conspiracy theorist?; hardly. This is simply what we did. When we ran out of gold and we borrowed the gold that we would need if the gold actually existed, but it didn’t, so the only way to get away with it was to treat the DEBT as real. This would make the “borrowed gold” real, as it were. And they did, and we bought it and theydid it more and we bent over and took it all.
This “debt” that took Greece and Italy from our world (because they are no more) is not real, but it is killing us and it might just succeed. Now if you’re thinking, if it’s not real, then it can’t kill us, then you get detention and here’s why. It’s like WATER.
WATER? Yes, water. We need water in order to survive. Without water, we die, quickly, of dehydration, this is a commonly known fact and the visual image that comes to mind is of a person in a hot and arid place like a desert, dropping dead from the thirst. Scratch that image for a moment and replace it with this one: You are in a life raft, floating in the ocean, lost and adrift. You are the sole survivor of a shipwreck and you’ve been out at sea for two days now, in the raft, in the sun with no provisions left. You start to get thirsty, very thirsty. You become delirious and suddenly you realize Wait a minute! I’m floating in an ocean of WATER! You laugh and you drink and drink and drink and 8 to 10 hours later, your kidneys shut down and you die, of what is essentially DEHYDRATION, because it’s not really WATER, it’s SALT WATER. Oh, they’re both wet, but the salt water is poison and will kill you. The DEBT is our salt water. We ran out of fresh water and just began drinking that salty debt water up in our delirium for more. If you can imagine some math to convert salt water to debt and establish a parallel between the time it takes salt water to kill a person and the time it will take the debt to kill what’s left of the human race, you could say that we’re in the 6th hour of the last 8 hours of our life as we know it. If we keep drinking the salt water for 2 more hours, we DIE, but if we stop drinking the fucking salt water we will have landed on a sandy beach with a beautiful fresh water spring nearby and we will LIVE.
I want to LIVE and I think that you do too. Please, stop drinking the salt water, it’s NOT REAL WATER. If we stop feeding this nightmare called the debt and stop believing that it’s real, then we can just throw away the civilization that we broke and BUILD ANOTHER ONE. After all, whose planet is this, ours or the debts?
We can do better.
ctwfrank
